Ron Paul on Obama’s Iraq Speech: Mission Not Accomplished

September 1, 2010 Leave a comment

LAKE JACKSON, Texas–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Congressman Ron Paul today released the following statement on President Obama’s speech from the Oval Office last night:

“From my viewpoint we are the losers in this fool’s errand of endless war. Tragically, this new policy is not one of peace but merely a charade that will severely undermine our national security and continue us down the path to bankruptcy—a threat that we best not long ignore.”

“The President’s announcement that all U.S. combat troops have left Iraq is no more believable than the ‘Mission Accomplished’ declaration was in 2003.

“Once again, we are being told the mission has been accomplished and our brave men and women are coming back home. Though the people are hopeful they remain skeptical, and rightfully so.

“The biggest problem is that success in Iraq is undefinable since the mission was never defined. The reasons given for the invasion were based on misinformation. Now, the war has cost us hundreds of billions of dollars and this has contributed significantly to our economic woes.

“Forty-four hundred Americans are dead, thirty thousand severely wounded, and more than a hundred thousand are suffering from serious health problems related to Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome. This alone should tell us that it was not worth the investment and the needless sacrifice of our young people and the taxpayers.

“It is deceitful to imply we will avoid hostilities with this new policy. We still have to contend with:

  • the 50,000 troops carrying weapons remain in Iraq
  • the 100,000 contractors that remain with more expected to go to Iraq
  • the 9,000 special ops personnel trained in assassinations that remain in Iraq
  • a huge embassy, bigger than the Vatican, that will remain
  • Dozens of military bases that will stay
  • Al Qaeda organizations that did not exist before the war
  • Muqtada al Sadr, a strong nationalist who has gained much political power
  • The fact that Iran benefits tremendously with the Shiites now in power in Iraq and is a close ally of al Sadr

“Osama bin Laden wins by ‘proving’ that America has an agenda of occupation in the Middle East. And, we continue to walk into his trap and hand him up his best recruitment tool in his efforts to incite hatred and terrorism against the United States.

“What’s worse, President Obama made it clear last night that the troops and resources leaving Iraq will not come home to defend our country or ease our economic woes. They will instead be diverted to Afghanistan, perhaps also Pakistan and, I fear, even Iran.

“From my viewpoint we are the losers in this fool’s errand of endless war. Tragically, this new policy is not one of peace but merely a charade that will severely undermine our national security and continue us down the path to bankruptcy—a threat that we best not long ignore.”

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20100901006229/en/Ron-Paul-Obama%E2%80%99s-Iraq-Speech-Mission-Accomplished

The “Wasted” Vote

I was having lunch with a few of my co-workers last week, and while enjoying our BBQ we got into the subject of our country’s latest presidential failure.  The conversation ended up going back to the fateful election in which most of the American people fell for the false promise of “change”.  I mentioned that no one I voted for had actually won an election.  One of my co-workers responded by saying, “Yeah, but you waste your vote”.

I’d like to clear up this misnomer.  No thoughtfully cast vote is a wasted vote.  If you make the effort to research the candidates, show support for the candidate(s) that fits your views, and solidify that support by honoring them with your vote on Election Day, your vote is not wasted.

This whole idea of the “wasted” vote stems from our failed two-party system.  We have the Republicans, and the Democrats.  For all intents and purposes, they are one in the same.  The only “differences” that seem to exist are there by design to give us, the American people the illusion of actually having a choice when the elections come around.  Because of this monopoly on the political system, we have been conditioned into the rather depressing mindset that any attempt to break free is folly; a lost cause; a wasted vote.  What exactly would make such a vote wasted?  Most would say because the candidate that the vote was “wasted” on could never win.  Really?  If enough people “waste” their votes, the candidate could in fact win, could they not?  This is the great secret.  This is what the puppet masters do not want the public to realize.  We have it within our power to take back our once great nation.  Just as it is said that “one drop raises the sea” so does one vote bring a candidate closer to victory.

The only way that we will actually produce change is by breaking the two-party system, and razing it to the ground.  The more we are able to come to this realization, the better it will be for everyone (except of course those wishing to keep the wool over our eyes).  So I challenge every American voter to vote not by party, but by candidate.  Research those who are running, choose with whom your allegiance lays (and be sure theirs lies with our Constitution) and cast your vote.  Let every vote be counted!  May the drops form into a tidal wave of liberty surging through Washington D.C. and sweeping from the halls of Congress and the White House the corruption that has endangered our freedom for so long.

Our current government is bought and paid for by corporations and special interest groups.  This applies to both parties.  There are a few exceptions, but for the most part our government is “by the corporations, for the corporations”.  The candidates already in the system are already spoiled (again, with few exceptions).  The only way to bring in untainted blood is by electing outsiders – people who will terrify the Establishment.  The only way this can happen is if we break away from what we’ve been conditioned into thinking about our current government’s political structure.  Good candidates running in either major party get shut down at the Primaries.  The Establishment favorites win the party nomination, and then both nominees have it out in a big theatrical act we call the General Election.  Either way the puppet-master wins.  They pick the candidates, they position them, and then they bring them before the American people to give us the illusion of having a real choice.  We need to see through the charade!  Look at the other candidates running!  Do some research!

The closest thing to a “wasted” vote is one cast idly and without regard for its impact or respect for the power it possesses to change the direction of our country.

Share on Facebook

Categories: Opinion

Time to reload!

Now that I have a little free time without school and a job at which I would “normal” hours I hope to update this on a regular basis.  At this point in time I do not know if anyone will read this blog, and honestly it isn’t that important.  I would love for others to read this and interact, but I also enjoy just speaking… or typing my mind.

Categories: Administrative

The First Presidential “Debate” 9/26/08 – Part 1

September 28, 2008 Leave a comment

Friday evening the two major party candidates, Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona, and Democratic Senator Barack Obama of Illinois met to “debate” at the University of Mississippi.  The first question posed by Moderator Jim Lehrer was: “Gentlemen, at this very moment tonight, where do you stand on the financial recovery plan?”  Senator Obama was given the first two minutes to respond to the question.  His answer was not an answer, but a typical political skirt of the question.  He did not say specifically whether or not he supported the bailout plan.  He did mention four points that he believes need to be implemented as part of the bailout.  Still, he did not directly address the issue.  Sen. McCain answered similarly.  He did not directly answer the question.  Both candidates seem to agree that the troubles of Wall Street should not be dumped on “Main Street”.

After the initial non-responses of both candidates, Mr. Lehrer cornered the candidates and asked them again if they intended to vote for the proposed bailout plan.  When pressured, Sen. McCain said “sure”.  Sen. Obama still did not directly respond to the question.  The closest he offered to a response was, “…the question, I think, that we’ve got to ask ourselves is, yes, we’ve got to solve this problem short term. And we are going to have to intervene; there’s no doubt about that.”

Alright, now let us consider these responses.  Sen. McCain and Sen. Obama both agree that the failures of Wall Street should not cause the residents of Main Street to suffer.  Right?  But, then Sen. McCain later states that “sure” he would vote for the bailout.  Sen. Obama gives basically the same response, albeit indirect.  Anyone else notice a contradiction here?  We have two men, each hoping to be the next President of the United States of America, and both agree that we the people should not be burdened with the collapse of Wall Street, however both also agree that the bailout must happen!

Perhaps you still miss my point.  To clarify, let us consider the bailout.  Currently, the price tag is $700 billion (yes, with a B), or for those of us who are more visual $700,000,000,000.  Now just where is the government going to get this money?  They certainly don’t have it laying around.  We are already in the hole so far that we have borrowed $500 billion from our friendly Communist neighbors in China to support the failed war in the Middle East, but I digress.  The only way for the Federal Government to come up with that kind of cash is to print it.  Printing money out of thin air is what got us into this mess in the first place, more on that in a future post.  Printing money causes inflation.  The more money there is in circulation, the less “rare” it is, and the less value that money is deemed to hold.  Consider, if gold were as common as say, the gravel used to pave roads, it would not have any value, because it would not be rare.  It is the rarity of gold that gives it its value.  The same holds true of money.  The more common it is (the more there is in circulation) the less it is worth.  So while the government prints their $700 billion for the bailout, they are robbing the American people of their hard earned cash.  Your salary does not go up to account for this kind of inflation.  So you are left making the same amount of money, but unable to buy the same amount of goods you could six months ago.

Is this not the exact opposite of what Sen. Obama and Sen. McCain both said about not thrusting the failure of the financial sector on the private sector?  By supporting the proposed bailout, both candidates are giving us, the American people the shaft.  How can you trust either one of these men to run your country?  They are both out to serve the businesses of Wall Street at the expense of the American people they claim so falsely to serve.

Video of the debate here.

Full text transcript of the debate here.

Please give your thoughts in the comments.

More commentary on the debate to come…

The High Tide

September 19, 2008 Leave a comment

This is a great video.  It raises all of the reasons we need to break the current corrupt system.  So, as you await our upcoming content, please enjoy the High Tide.

Categories: Ron Paul

Welcome!

September 16, 2008 Leave a comment

Welcome to the Pillars of Liberty blog!  Please bare with us as we get things organized and ready to go.  Real content will be forthcoming.  Thank you for your patience!

Categories: Administrative